CONSUMER-LED FORMALIZATION AND INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN TOWNSHIP ECONOMIES: EVIDENCE FROM SOWETO, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Main Article Content

Emmanuel Ating Onwioduokit
Tebogo F. Mopeloa

Abstract

This study developed and empirically tested a multidimensional framework explaining the formalization of informal enterprises in township economies, with a focus on Soweto, South Africa. Drawing on an integrative theoretical foundation combining Institutional Theory, the Resource-Based View (RBV), Entrepreneurship Theory, Stakeholder Theory, and Market Orientation Theory, the paper reconceptualizes formalization as a consumer-driven process rather than a purely regulatory outcome. Using quantitative design and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) on enterprise-level survey data, the study examined how institutional support, resource capacity, entrepreneurial adaptability, stakeholder engagement, and market orientation influence formalization through key mediators, including access to finance, business capabilities, trust in institutions, and consumer demand amplification. The results indicated that consumer demand amplification is the most powerful mediating mechanism, linking firm-level strategies to formalization and broader inclusive development outcomes. Formalization significantly enhances firm performance and contributes to employment creation and income growth. However, regulatory complexity weakens institutional effects, while social capital strengthens entrepreneurial pathways. The findings challenge conventional supply-side policy approaches and highlight the importance of demand-driven, bottom-up formalization strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Onwioduokit, E., & Mopeloa, T. (2026). CONSUMER-LED FORMALIZATION AND INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT IN TOWNSHIP ECONOMIES: EVIDENCE FROM SOWETO, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. International Journal of Social Sciences, 18(1), 72 – 91. https://doi.org/10.60787/ijss.vol18no1.271

Share

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.

Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development, and institutions. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9135-9

Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.005

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to firm growth: Does firm size matter? Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00727.x

De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. Basic Books.

Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399436

Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2024). Informality and entrepreneurship: A global perspective. World Development, 165, 106211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106211

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827

Hino, H. (2024). Informal economy dynamics and institutional change. Journal of Development Studies, 60(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2023.2212345

International Labour Organization. (2022). Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical picture (3rd ed.). ILO.

Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 591–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.006

Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.

https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.

Rocha, R., Ulyssea, G., & Rachter, L. (2018). Do lower taxes reduce informality? Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Development Economics, 134, 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.05.003

Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage.

Ulyssea, G. (2018). Firms, informality, and development: Theory and evidence from Brazil. American Economic Review, 108(8), 2015–2047. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141745

Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.